Medium: Oil on panel
Dimensions: 64.5 × 80.5 cm
Signature: Not signed; studio stamped
Period of execution: 1875 - 1946
Price: ¥ 20,000
This painting belongs to Cécile Hertz-Eyrolles's Nude series, created between the 1930s and 1950s. The careful attention to bodily volumes, relaxed posture, and subtle modelling evokes a desire to capture the tranquil grace of a suspended moment. The Nabis rejected Renaissance ideals of easel painting as windows onto fictional worlds. Disavowing spatial illusion, they abandoned both linear perspective and volumetric modelling. Here, Hertz-Eyrolles pays homage to Nabis principles by adopting a milky nude spectrum that unifies the foreground body with the background cloth upon which she reclines, creating a tonally flattened pictorial plane.
Meanwhile, like many Impressionists and Post-Impressionists, Hertz-Eyrolles drew inspiration from the broad planes of unmediated colour, thick outlines, and bold patterns characterising Japanese prints. The clear contour lines encircling the nude's arms and thighs—rendered in brick red and dark green—clearly reference Ukiyo-e print figures, while broad highlight passages reinforce the direct paint application typical of pan-Eastern appropriation among Hertz-Eyrolles's Impressionist contemporaries. Similar forthright brushwork appears in paintings by Manet, Van Gogh, Édouard Vuillard, and numerous others. This reclining nude evokes pictorial traditions inherited from masters of intimacy, where the absence of artifice emphasises the model's unadorned presence.
The painting constitutes a double-sided diptych, with another domestic scene—a woman at her dressing table—painted on the reverse, reinforcing immersion into the artist's domestic and feminine world.
Cécile Hertz-Eyrolles was born on 7 November 1875 into an intellectually inclined family. Demonstrating an early aptitude for the arts, she went on to receive formal training at the Académie Carrière — a remarkable achievement at a time when women faced considerable barriers to professional art education. The academic study of the nude figure, regarded as foundational to artistic development, was considered unsuitable for female students, and institutional routes to training remained largely closed to them. Despite this, Hertz-Eyrolles had the distinction of studying directly under the academy's founder, the Symbolist painter Eugène Carrière. The institution would prove pivotal in modern art history, numbering among its alumni Henri Matisse and André Derain, whose work helped lay the groundwork for Fauvism and left a discernible mark on Picasso's early development.
Her emergence as a professional artist in early twentieth-century Paris carries significance on more than one level. As Linda Nochlin argued in her landmark 1971 essay "Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?", women had long been systematically excluded from the institutional frameworks — education, patronage, professional recognition — that shaped artistic careers. Hertz-Eyrolles's body of work, therefore, holds value not only on its own aesthetic terms but as part of a broader historical reckoning with whose art has been preserved, exhibited, and taken seriously.
Her paintings gravitate toward the intimate and the everyday: dining rooms, sitting rooms, gardens — spaces that Impressionist painters often treated as incidental backdrop rather than primary subject. Where contemporaries such as Renoir, Édouard Vuillard, and Émile Bernard engaged with domestic interiors, they tended to do so from a position of external observation, rendering family life in terms of soft light, sentimental warmth, and a certain nostalgic femininity projected from without. Hertz-Eyrolles worked differently. Her vantage point was interior — shaped by an inhabiting rather than a visiting perspective — and her canvases reflect this: warm without being idealised, attentive to the quiet fatigue that runs beneath the rhythms of domestic life. Through restrained colour and carefully modulated light, she renders emotional ambivalence and physical presence with a directness that distinguishes her from post-Impressionist contemporaries more preoccupied with visual harmony than psychological truth. Her range extended well beyond the domestic, encompassing landscapes, portraits, maritime scenes, and architectural studies.
Hertz-Eyrolles exhibited regularly at the Salon d'Automne, the Salon National des Beaux-Arts, and the Salon des Artistes Indépendants. In 2024, the city of Cachan held a summer retrospective in her honour. Her works are held in several public collections, among them the Eugène Carrière Museum — an apt resting place for an artist whose career began under that institution's roof.
Reference: Linda Nochlin, "Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?" in Women, Art and Power and Other Essays (New York: Harper & Row, 1988), 145–178.